"If something isn't aesthetically pleasing or interesting, doesn't require skills I do not have, and makes a stupid point stupidly, I don't appreciate it as art. That doesn't make me a philistine. It makes me a non-rube."

--Jonah Goldberg

Wednesday, August 5, 2009

The One with Wren

104. Title & Author: Wren by Margaret Whinney (205 pages)
Genre: Nonfiction—Art History
Completed: 20 July 2009

Summary & Review:
Whinney examines the various architectural works of Sir Christopher Wren including his few private residences, his Royal palaces, various secular buildings, and his numerous City Churches. The largest single chunk of the book is devoted to Wren’s crowning achievement: St. Paul’s.

As I was reading the author’s acknowledgment in the last book I just read about Wren, Christopher Wren by Kerry Downes (#102), I noticed that he thanked a Margaret Whinney for her help even though she was writing her own volume on Wren, and sure enough in this book Whinney thanked Downes for his help on her book. Not only were these books written at essentially the exact same time, but they covered the same material. Of the two, I must admit I preferred Whinney’s. This book was more logically organized which lent a flow and order to the material that was missing in Downes’. Also, I found her analyses to be both more interesting and more insightful.

Here was a great passage which I think aptly and fairly sums up the life and career of Wren: “Finally, is must never be forgotten that he could not draw on the apparently endless financial resources of Louis XIV or of the Roman Church. Almost all his buildings were hampered for lack of money. And it may well be that that very ability to compromise, to seek and find another solution and to get the work done, which was part of his strength as a man, was not always to the advantage of his architecture. Had he possessed the power and the arrogance of a Bernini, and the flawless taste of a François Mansart, many of his buildings would never have been accomplished. He is an uneven architect, but St Paul’s and Greenwich" - and I would add St. Stephen, Walbrook - "surely entitle him to a high place even among his seventeenth-century contemporaries, and without his City churches and his brick and stone palaces England would be much the poorer.” (203)

Rating: 7.5

0 comments: